Summary
Avalon turns orbital infrastructure from a series of fixed capital projects into a reusable production platform. Standard Elogium blocks are joined in orbit and rebuilt around each tenant's equipment.
- The problem. A fixed station commits its mass to one configuration before launch. It costs about $7–8M per m³ to build, every expansion costs about the same again, and its floor costs about $8.3M per m³ per year. That is 43 to 290 times what Earth-scale production earns per m³.
- The innovation. Novo Navis weaves standard structural blocks at production scale and joins them into pressure structure in orbit with carbon nanotube welding. Bays are built around the equipment and rebuilt when a tenant's process changes, and every tenant draws on one shared power, cooling and life-support backbone.
- The economic consequence, including the core platform. Per rented m³ per year, with the core platform, expansion, capital and operating cost all included, against a fixed station's $6.6M:
| Case | Avalon, per rented m³ per year | Against a fixed station's $6.6M |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 at today's launch price | $284k–889k | 7–23 times less |
| Year 5 at today's launch price | $136k–299k | 22–48 times less |
| Year 5 at $1,000/kg | $58k–143k | 46–113 times less |
- Cheaper launch helps Avalon most. Launch is most of Avalon's expansion cost and a small slice of a fixed station's. Falling launch prices cut Avalon's expansion cost by about 90%, and a fixed station's by about 5%.
- Shared power costs a fraction of today's price. Avalon's shared solar power costs about $4.80 per kWh today and $2.70 at $1,000/kg launch. The ISS's price to commercial users is $42 per kWh.
In this document, Avalon (A.C.S.) is the station and Novo Navis is the company that builds and operates it.
The production gap
A fixed-module station must charge about $8.3M per m³ per year, 43 to 290 times what an Earth-scale production floor earns.
No commercial station publishes floor pricing, so the price is rebuilt from cost.
- Cost basis: Starlab's own estimate of $2.8–3.3B to design, build and launch about 400 m³ of pressurized volume, or $7–8M per m³.
- Break-even: paying off $3.05B over 30 years at a 15% return, plus operating costs of 7.5% of build cost a year, spread over 105 rented m³ (150 m³ usable, 70% rented), comes to about $6.6M per m³ per year.
- Price: a 15–25% margin gives about $8.3M per m³ per year, with a range of $4–14.5M.
| Earth-scale production unit | Revenue per m³ of floor per year | Fixed-station floor price is |
|---|---|---|
| SiC crystal furnace | ~$194k | 43× |
| Silicon crystal puller | ~$170k | 49× |
| Metal powder atomizer | ~$64k | 130× |
| Cell therapy production | ~$28k | 290× |
A fixed-station floor costs more each year than everything production equipment on it could earn. That is why today's stations sell research space, not production space.
Fixed stations can't get cheaper
A fixed station's cost per m³ is the same at every size, because each expansion is another module bought at the original cost.
| Station | Build cost per m³ of pressurized volume | What expansion costs |
|---|---|---|
| ISS | ~$82M (US spend only) | A new module at the same order of cost |
| Vast Haven-1 | over $22M | A new station (Haven-2) |
| Starlab | $7–8M | Another module at about the same cost per m³ |
| Starship used as a station | ~$100–200k (inferred) | Another ship at the same cost each time |
- The cost per m³ never falls. Doubling a fixed station doubles its cost, so its floor price can't drop as it grows.
- The size limit never lifts. Every module is capped by the hatch it connects through (1.3 m on the ISS) or by its rocket's fairing (5.2 m for Falcon 9, about 9 m for Starship). Production equipment bigger than that has nowhere to go.
- Starship is the cheapest fixed option, and it is still fixed. Each ship is a 9 m-wide container whose cost repeats with every ship added.
Stranded mass
Every kilogram launched into a fixed module is locked into one shape, one hatch size and one purpose until it is thrown away.
- Fixed modules carry 137–311 kg of mass per m³ of volume: Destiny 138, Columbus 137, Harmony 189, Haven-1 311. None of it can be reshaped when a tenant leaves, a process changes or a bigger machine arrives.
- When the station ends, all of its mass ends with it. The ISS weighs 430 t. NASA is paying SpaceX $843M just for the vehicle that will push it into the ocean. At today's launch price of about $3,250/kg, that mass took about $1.4B in launch alone to put up.
- Short-life stations strand mass sooner. Haven-1 is designed for about 3 years. Every kilogram it launches is written off on that schedule.
- Cheaper launch doesn't rescue stranded mass. It makes the next module cheaper. It does nothing for mass already flown, which keeps its shape, its limits and its cost until it is deorbited.
Capital has to earn back the launch it rode on
When launch gets cheaper, a fixed station can match a newer rival's price only by writing off capital it has already flown.
It works like gasoline already in the tank: a lower price at the pump next week doesn't refund what you paid. A fixed operator can still cut its price. The difference comes out of the return on its capital.
| Fixed module mass | Launch capital per m³ at $3,250/kg (today) | The same module launched at $1,000/kg (projected) |
|---|---|---|
| 137 kg/m³ (Columbus) | $445k | $137k |
| 311 kg/m³ (Haven-1) | $1.0M | $311k |
- Old capital competes with new. A module flown today carries $445k–1.0M of launch per m³. A rival flying the same module at $1,000/kg carries $137k–311k. To match the rival's price, the first operator writes off the difference.
- Each module earns only from its own tenants. A fixed module's capital is paid back by whoever can use that shape, until it is deorbited. When a tenant's needs change, the module has no other use.
- Avalon's capital earns across every configuration. Blocks are re-emplaced when needs change, so each kilogram's capital keeps earning through every tenant it serves. In the two-tenant example below, 79% of the second tenant's structure cost is avoided by reusing the first tenant's blocks.
- Avalon buys each expansion at that day's launch price. Its average cost per m³ falls as launch prices fall, rather than being set by the price of its first launch.
The depreciation mismatch
On Earth, a fab building lasts 30–50 years while the tools inside it turn over every 3–5 years. Owners depreciate the building and the tools separately, and the building outlives many tool cycles.
A fixed station fuses the building and the tool envelope into one module. A tenant who signs a 3-year lease for a purpose-built module leaves the operator holding 27 years of hull that may suit no one else. Avalon separates the two the way an industrial landlord does: Elogium structure is paid off over 30 years across 6–10 successive tenant tool cycles, and each cycle's bay is rebuilt from the same blocks.
Reconfigurable mass outclasses fixed mass
Avalon adds enclosed volume for $102k–564k per m³, 13 to 75 times less than a fixed module's $7.6M, and reuses that structure across tenants.
What an expansion costs
| Component | Cost per kg | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Elogium production | ~$100 | T700 carbon fiber at $26–30/kg, resin, and the loom spread over 250 t/yr |
| Kit configuration (cleats, hardware, machining) | ~$75 | About 75% of material cost |
| Assembly, welding, inspection and commissioning | ~$100 | Two robotic assembly teams at commercial in-orbit servicing rates (about $13M a year each), spread over 250 t/yr |
| Launch, today (Falcon 9) | $3,250 | Published pricing |
| Launch, projected (Starship) | $1,000 | Analyst projections |
| Total, today / projected | $3,525 / $1,275 |
Three measures, kept separate
| Measure | Fixed station (Starlab-class) | Avalon expansion, today | Avalon expansion at $1,000/kg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Structural capital cost per m³ enclosed | $7.6M | $282k–564k | $102k–204k |
| Annual infrastructure cost per rented m³ (capital + operating) | $6.6M | $122k–244k | $44k–88k |
| Commercial floor price per rented m³ per year | $8.3M | $13k–571k, set per industry | $13k–571k, set per industry |
The ranges run from 80 kg of kit per m³ enclosed (20 m radius) to 160 kg (10 m radius).
What the first platform costs
Before the first expansion, Avalon needs a core: power, thermal control, life support, docking, robotics and welding systems. That core is inferred at $500M–1B, or $114M–227M a year once paid off and operated. Spread across rented floor, it costs $162k–645k per rented m³ in year one. By year five it falls to $14k–55k as one loom's output fills in around it.
Worked example: two tenants, same structure
- Tenant A runs a crystallization suite in a 100 m³ bay, built from 16 t of blocks.
- Tenant A leaves. Tenant B needs 120 m³, including headroom for a 12.7 m silicon crystal puller.
| Fixed station | Avalon | |
|---|---|---|
| Can tenant B be served? | No. The puller can't pass a 1.3 m hatch or fit any 5.2–9 m module | Yes. The bay is rebuilt around it |
| Structure reused | None. A's space stays as it was | All 16 t of A's blocks |
| New structure launched | A new module would be needed, and none can hold the puller | 3.2 t, for 20 m³ |
| Cost to serve tenant B | No equivalent exists. No fixed module can hold the puller at any price | $14.5M: $3.2M to take down and re-emplace 16 t, plus $11.3M of new kit |
| Saving from reuse | $53M, or 79% of a fresh 120 m³ build ($67.7M) | |
| Time to tenant B's production | Years, for a new module design | One launch plus assembly, about 2–4 months (projected from the assembly rate) |
Why it holds
- Cost per m³ falls with size. A bigger enclosure needs less wall per m³ inside, because volume grows faster than surface. Doubling the radius halves the kit mass per m³.
- No size limit. Bays are built around the equipment, so Earth-scale tools go up unchanged. They aren't shrunk to fit a hatch and requalified, which takes about 4 years for a new production line.
- Nothing is stranded. Blocks are moved and re-emplaced when a process changes, so the mass keeps earning through every configuration.
- The station feeds itself. Avalon makes methane, recycles water, grows biomass and produces Elogium feedstock on orbit. Every kilogram it makes is one a fixed station must buy as resupply at $20,000–70,000/kg.
Shared utilities: power, cooling and life support
Avalon runs one power, cooling and life-support backbone for its own production and shares it with every tenant. Its power costs about $4.80 per kWh today, against the ISS's price to commercial users of $42 per kWh.
A fixed station sizes its utilities to itself: Starlab's entire 35 kW can't run one 50 kW crystal furnace. Avalon adds arrays and radiators with each expansion, mounted on the same structure, so power grows with floor space.
| Per kW of continuous power | Today ($3,250/kg launch) | At $1,000/kg |
|---|---|---|
| Solar arrays ($15/W hardware, 10 kg per kW, sized 1.6× to cover the dark part of each orbit) | $76k | $40k |
| Power management | $10k | $10k |
| Radiators (about 15 kg per kW of heat, plus hardware) | $59k | $25k |
| Eclipse storage | $20k | $20k |
| Installed cost per kW | ~$165k | ~$95k |
| Annual cost per kW | ~$37.5k | ~$21.6k |
| Cost per kWh | ~$4.80 | ~$2.70 |
- The biorefinery is the station's battery. Solar arrays are the primary power source. The anaerobic biorefinery turns biomass into methane, which fuel cells burn through each eclipse in place of batteries, and which also serves as propellant.
- Waste is shared too. Furnace waste heat warms the biorefinery's digesters. CO₂ from crew and processes feeds the biomass.
- One plant beats many small ones. A single large power, thermal and life-support plant shared across tenants costs less per kW than each fixed station running its own small system, the way an industrial park does on Earth.
What Novo Navis built to make this real
Two Novo Navis technologies turn reconfigurable mass from an idea into a pressurized production floor: a scalable 3D carbon fiber weaving process, and carbon nanotube welding.
Scalable 3D-woven carbon fiber (Elogium)
- Repeatable structural units. The process produces solid, void-free blocks of a fixed size, 14 × 14 × 36 inches. A repeatable unit is what makes a building standard possible: every block is interchangeable, and every bay is assembled from the same parts.
- Production scale. A single loom load yields about 250 tonnes of material a year. That supplies structure by the tonne, not part by part.
- Machinable aerospace structure. The blocks are dense enough to machine like metal, so cleats, interfaces and hardware are cut into them directly. They are 2.4 times thicker than conventional 3D-woven preforms.
- Proven origin. The process was developed under an Air Force SBIR Phase I award.
Carbon nanotube welding
- Blocks become pressure structure. Novo Navis's carbon nanotube welding joins composite structures on orbit. Individually launched blocks become continuous, sealed walls, which turns modular construction into pressurized modules.
- Bays can be added and changed. Because joints are made on orbit, the station's shape isn't fixed at launch. Bays are built around the equipment that goes in them and rebuilt when a tenant's process changes.
Together, the weave supplies standard structural units at production scale, and the weld makes them airtight in orbit. That is what lets Avalon grow without the hatch and fairing limits of every fixed station.
The moat
Novo Navis holds a two-layer technical moat, and a competitor would need both layers to build this way.
- The weave can't be bought. The loom solves the problem that keeps 3D-woven composites small everywhere else. The matrix resin is a proprietary in-house blend held as a trade secret. Together they produce void-free, machinable blocks at production scale.
- The weld can't be bought. Carbon nanotube welding of composite structures is a Novo Navis process, also held as a trade secret. Without it, woven blocks are building material. With it, they are a pressure hull assembled in orbit.
- The pair is the moat. Blocks without the weld can't hold pressure, and a weld without the blocks has no standard structure to join. A competitor would have to independently solve both, then prove them in orbit.
- SBIR Phase III rights. The Elogium SBIR award carries Phase III rights. Federal agencies can award Novo Navis follow-on work that extends or completes the SBIR effort without a new competition.
Industry by industry
At today's launch price, Avalon floor costs less per unit than the ground price for ZBLAN fiber, GaN wafers and SiC substrates. At $1,000/kg it does for six of nine products. A fixed station's floor costs 3 to 2,200 times the ground price for all nine.
Each row runs the same Earth-scale production equipment on each floor. Figures are floor cost per unit of product, the share of production cost set by the station, per rented m³ with capital and operating cost included. Avalon figures are the midpoint of the 80–160 kg/m³ range.
| Product | Ground price or cost per unit | Fixed-station floor per unit | Avalon floor per unit, today | % of ground | Avalon floor per unit at $1,000/kg | % of ground |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZBLAN fiber, per m | $200 | $578 | $13 | 6% | $4.64 | 2% |
| GaN wafer, 2-inch | $2,000 | $24,800 | $549 | 27% | $199 | 10% |
| SiC substrate, per kg | $30,000 | $1.28M | $28,400 | 95% | $10,300 | 34% |
| Silicon wafer, per kg | $850 | $41,300 | $916 | 108% | $331 | 39% |
| Crystallized biologic, per kg | $75,000 to make | $4.13M | $91,600 | 122% | $33,100 | 44% |
| SiC epi wafer, 150 mm | $1,100 | $92,800 | $2,060 | 187% | $745 | 68% |
| Metal powder, per kg | $200 | $25,900 | $574 | 287% | $208 | 104% |
| Battery separator, per m² | $0.10 | $55 | $1.22 | 1,221% | $0.44 | 442% |
| Cell therapy, per patient | $63,000 to make | $139M | $3.08M | 4,884% | $1.11M | 1,766% |
Total landed cost: floor, power and shipping
A producer pays for floor, power, and shipping up and down. At today's launch price, ZBLAN fiber and GaN wafers come in below their ground price with all three included. Biologics come in at a fraction of a percent of the drug's selling value.
| Product | Floor | Power | Shipping up and down | Total landed cost per unit | Ground price or cost | Orbital premium needed to break even |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZBLAN fiber, per m | $13 | $1.13 | $2.66 | $17 | $200 | none (8% of ground) |
| GaN wafer, 2-inch | $549 | $375 | $221 | $1,146 | $2,000 | none (57% of ground) |
| Crystallized biologic, per kg | $91,600 | $3,750 | $50,250 | $145,600 | $75,000 to make; $25–60M to sell | 1.9× the making cost; 0.2–0.6% of selling value |
| SiC epi wafer, 150 mm | $2,060 | $352 | $1,005 | $3,420 | $1,100 | 3.1× |
| SiC substrate, per kg | $28,400 | $24,200 | $50,250 | $102,800 | $30,000 | 3.4× |
| Silicon wafer, per kg | $916 | $234 | $50,250 | $51,400 | $850 | 60× |
- First customers: ZBLAN fiber, GaN wafers and biologic crystallization. Their product is valuable enough per kilogram to carry floor, power and shipping today.
- Next: SiC substrates and SiC epi. They need about a 3× orbital premium today, and less as launch and return costs fall.
- Silicon, metal powder, separators and cell therapy need return costs to fall, or the product to be used in orbit, before they close. For silicon, shipping alone is 98% of the landed cost.
What return-shipping price does to the ranking
If the price of bringing product down drops from $47,000/kg to $2,000/kg, SiC moves to about 2× the ground price and silicon from 60× to 8×. ZBLAN and GaN barely move, because their product weighs almost nothing per unit of value.
Each cell is the landed cost as a multiple of the ground price, at today's launch price.
| Product | Return at $47,000/kg | Return at $10,000/kg | Return at $2,000/kg |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZBLAN fiber | 0.08× | 0.07× | 0.07× |
| GaN wafer | 0.57× | 0.49× | 0.47× |
| Crystallized biologic (vs. making cost) | 1.94× | 1.45× | 1.34× |
| SiC substrate | 3.43× | 2.19× | 1.93× |
| SiC epi wafer | 3.11× | 2.43× | 2.29× |
| Silicon wafer | 60× | 17× | 7.5× |
ZBLAN and GaN depend on high value per kilogram, not on cheaper return. SiC and silicon depend on both cheaper return and cheaper floor. The base case uses $47,000/kg throughout.
What Avalon earns as launch costs fall
Falling launch prices cut Avalon's floor cost by about 90% and a fixed station's by about 5%, so every drop widens Avalon's lead.
A fixed station's cost is mostly hardware, and launch is a small slice of it. Avalon's expansion cost is mostly launch, so it falls nearly in step with launch prices.
| Launch price | Avalon expansion cost per rented m³ per year | Starlab-class cost per rented m³ per year | Starship used as a station |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3,250/kg (today) | $122k–244k | $6.6M | $270k |
| $1,000/kg (projected) | $44k–88k | $6.4M | $123k |
| $200/kg (long-term cost estimate) | $16k–33k | $6.3M | $71k |
Avalon's expansion floor costs less than a Starship used as a station at every launch price above. A ship is also capped at about 9 m wide, so equipment like a 12.7 m crystal puller can't go in it at any price.
A ship is also sold whole. A GaN producer needs about 15 m³ and a ZBLAN producer about 35 m³, and neither can finance a 350 m³ rented ship alone. Putting several industrial tenants in one open hull means one tenant's leak, vibration or delay stops all of them. Avalon leases right-sized bays, from about 12 m³ to 500 m³ and up, on a shared utility grid. Each tenant rents only what it needs and expands bay by bay.
What Avalon can charge, and what it keeps
Avalon leases floor the way an industrial landlord does: base rent per m³, with power, cooling and shipping metered and billed separately at cost. Base rent is set so that it costs the client 20% of what their production earns on the ground. Biologics are the exception, priced on product value at about 1% of the drug value each m³ produces.
| Industry | Avalon base rent per m³ per year | Avalon margin at $3,250/kg | at $1,000/kg | at $200/kg | Fixed-station price is |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZBLAN fiber | $571k | 57–79% | 85–92% | 94–97% | 14× higher |
| Biologic crystallization | $500k | 51–76% | 82–91% | 93–97% | 17× higher |
| GaN wafers | $133k | below cost to 8% | 34–67% | 75–88% | 62× higher |
| SiC substrates | $39k | below cost | below cost | 15–58% | 213× higher |
| Silicon wafers | $34k | below cost | below cost | 3–52% | 243× higher |
| SiC epi wafers | $20k | below cost | below cost | below cost to 16% | 422× higher |
| Metal powder | $13k | below cost | below cost | below cost | 646× higher |
ZBLAN and biologics are profitable anchor tenants at today's launch price. No industry in the table can pay a fixed station's price for production. Falling launch costs open industry after industry to Avalon, and none of them to fixed stations.
From loom output to profit
Capacity becomes revenue in six steps: weave, kit, launch, assemble and weld, commission, rent. One loom makes 250 t of structure a year: 1,560–3,125 m³ of new enclosed volume, carried by 15–19 Falcon 9 launches or about 3 Starship launches.
Profit here is operating profit after the capital charge: base rent, minus 22.7% a year of the build cost of all capacity built (rented or not), minus the same charge on the core platform. Taxes, financing costs and working capital are not included. Power is billed at cost and nets to zero.
Two pricing cases at $1,000/kg launch. GaN-class rent is $133k per m³ per year. The blended rent of $250k assumes early bays go to the highest-paying tenants first: ZBLAN, biologics and federal anchor tenants.
| Year | Light build, GaN-class rent | Light build, blended rent | Heavy build, GaN-class rent | Heavy build, blended rent |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | −$93M | −$10M | −$253M | −$212M |
| 2 | $53M | $327M | −$216M | −$79M |
| 3 | $324M | $899M | −$117M | $171M |
| 4 | $469M | $1,237M | −$81M | $303M |
| 5 | $615M | $1,575M | −$44M | $436M |
| Rented m³ in year 5 | 8,203 | 8,203 | 4,102 | 4,102 |
- Light build (80 kg/m³, $500M core) passes a fully rented Starlab-class station's profit of about $173M a year in year 3 at GaN-class rent, and in year 2 at blended rent.
- Heavy build (160 kg/m³, $1B core) turns profitable in year 3 at blended rent and recovers its cumulative losses in year 4.
- A fixed station's profit is capped by what it launched once. Avalon's grows with every loom-year of new floor.
Assumptions for this section:
- Avalon costs: (Elogium $100 + kit $75 + assembly and welding $100 + launch) per kg × 80–160 kg per m³ enclosed. Paid off over 30 years at 15%, plus operating cost of 7.5% of build cost a year: 22.7% a year in all. 75% of volume usable.
- Occupancy: 30% of usable volume rented in year 1, 50% in year 2, and 70% from year 3.
- Core platform: $500M–1B, on the same 22.7% annual charge.
- Starlab-class costs: $3.05B including about $150M of launch, which scales with launch price. 150 of 400 m³ usable, 70% rented. Profit is a 20% margin on 105 rented m³ at $8.25M.
- Starship used as a station: about $90M of ship hardware plus 100 t lifted at the stated launch price. 1,000 m³, 50% usable, 70% rented.
- Base rent: each product's ground revenue per m³, from the equipment space and output in the assumptions table. Biologics: 2 kg of drug substance per m³ a year at $25M/kg or more.
Fuel, food and material for future expeditions
Avalon also produces fuel, food and structural material in orbit, so it supplies the expeditions that come after it as well as its tenants.
- Fuel. Avalon's biorefinery makes methane on orbit. Every kilogram made there is a kilogram of propellant that never has to be lifted out of Earth's gravity.
- Food. The same biomass system that feeds the biorefinery grows food for crews on the station and for crews passing through.
- Material. Biomass is also the precursor to Elogium, so the station grows the raw material for its own expansion and for structures built further out.
Each kilogram made in orbit is worth at least what it would cost to deliver: $1,000–3,250/kg to reach orbit, and $20,000–70,000/kg delivered to a station. A fixed station must buy all three from Earth at those prices. Avalon makes them, which makes it a supply depot as well as a production floor.
The cost and profit figures elsewhere in this document count none of these savings, apart from methane as eclipse storage. Every Elogium kilogram in the model is made on Earth and launched. Fuel, food and material made in orbit add to those figures; the case doesn't depend on them.
The case is clear. Unlike fixed stations, Avalon gets cheaper as it grows, gains from every drop in launch price, never strands its mass, and makes the fuel, food and material the next expeditions will need.
Assumptions and sources
Every comparison in this document uses one basis: cost per rented m³ per year, capital and operating cost included, for both Avalon and the fixed station.
Assumptions
| Item | Value used | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Capital recovery | 30 years at 15% | Applied to both Avalon and fixed stations |
| Operating cost | 7.5% of build cost a year | Applied to both |
| Fixed-station cost and price | $6.6M cost, $8.3M price per rented m³ per year ($4–14.5M) | Starlab's $3.05B estimate, 150 of 400 m³ usable, 70% rented, 15–25% margin |
| Avalon rented share | 52.5% of enclosed volume | 75% usable, 70% rented |
| Elogium production | ~$100/kg | T700 carbon fiber at $26–30/kg, resin, loom cost spread over 250 t/yr |
| Kit configuration | ~$75/kg | About 75% of material cost |
| Assembly, welding, inspection, commissioning | ~$100/kg | Two robotic teams at about $13M a year each, over 250 t/yr |
| Kit mass per m³ enclosed | 80 kg (20 m radius) to 160 kg (10 m radius) | Whole 14-inch blocks at 1.5 g/cm³ forming the wall |
| Core platform | $500M–1B | Inferred from the non-structure cost of Haven-1 (over $1B for 45 m³) and Starlab ($2.8–3.3B) |
| Reconfiguration | $200/kg of reused structure | Assembly cost twice: take down and re-emplace |
| Starship as a station | $90M ship hardware plus 100 t of launch; 1,000 m³, 50% usable | Inferred ship cost; volume from SpaceX's stated payload volume |
| Launch per loom-year | 15–19 Falcon 9 launches or about 3 Starship launches | 250 t at 13–17 t or 100 t per launch |
| Equipment space and output | Silicon puller 120 m³, 24 t/yr; SiC furnace 12 m³, 77 kg/yr; atomizer 141 m³, 45 t/yr; separator line 3,000 m³, 450M m²/yr; GaN reactor 15 m³, 5,000 wafers/yr; ZBLAN tower 35 m³, 500 km/yr; SiC epi reactor 180 m³, 16,000 wafers/yr; crystallization suite 500 m³, 1,000 kg/yr; cell therapy 17 m³ per patient a year | Atomizer from published dimensions; others inferred from tool dimensions and throughput |
| Client pricing | Base rent at 20% of the client's ground revenue per m³; biologics at about 1% of drug value per m³; power, cooling and shipping billed separately at cost | Leaves 80% for the client's other costs and profit |
| Shipping | Not in per-unit floor costs | Same per kg from any station |
Power and shipping assumptions
| Item | Value used | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Solar array hardware | $15/W | Starpath's published panel price (source) |
| Solar array mass | 10 kg per kW | ROSA-class blankets at about 100 W/kg (source) |
| Array oversizing | 1.6× | Covers the eclipse share of a low Earth orbit |
| Power management | $10k per kW | Inferred |
| Radiators | 15 kg per kW of heat, plus $10k per kW hardware | Inferred |
| Eclipse storage | $20k per kW | Inferred; methane fuel cells fed by the biorefinery |
| Power utilization | 90% | Inferred |
| Tool power draw | ZBLAN draw unit 15 kW; GaN reactor 50 kW; SiC furnace 50 kW; silicon puller 150 kW; SiC epi reactor 150 kW; crystallization suite 100 kW; atomizer 200 kW; separator line 2 MW; cell therapy 10 kW per patient a year | SiC furnace from research; others inferred from tool class |
| Shipping | Product mass down at $47,000/kg plus equal feedstock mass up at the launch price | ATMOS-class capsule return at full load |
| Unit masses | ZBLAN 53 g/km; 2-inch GaN wafer 4.4 g; 150 mm SiC epi wafer 20 g; separator 5 g/m²; cell therapy dose 0.1 kg packed | Material densities and dimensions |
Asset lives
| Asset | Life used | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Elogium structure | 30 years | Paid off over 30 years, reused across successive configurations |
| Core platform | 30 years | Same recovery period as the structure |
| Tenant installations (tools and fit-out) | 3–5 years | Typical production tool cycle on Earth; paid for by the tenant |
| Reconfiguration cycles per block | 6–10 over its life | 30-year structure life ÷ 3–5 year tenant cycles |
Sources
- Voyager Technologies 10-K, FY2025: Starlab cost estimate
- Starlab one-pager: volume and power
- NASA commercial and marketing pricing policy: ISS prices
- NASA OIG IG-22-005: ISS cost
- Vast Haven-1 lab and Haven-1: volume, mass, life
- Vast large docking adapter
- Destiny module and NASA BEAM fact sheet: module mass and cost
- Thales Alenia Axiom modules contract
- NASA picks SpaceX to build ISS deorbit vehicle: $843M, 430 t
- SpaceX Dragon and Falcon Heavy: launch and cargo
- ALD VIGA atomizer brochure: atomizer size and output
- ISPE, cell therapy cost of goods: floor and cost per patient
- SiC epitaxial wafer market report: epi wafer prices
- Rosendahl Nextrom draw tower: fiber tower size
- Brückner separator film lines: line width and output